STM vs Renesas
In this study, we are interested in comparing the performance of two similar boards from different manufacturers: the NUCLEO-L4R5ZI from STMicroelectronics and the Renesas RX65N.
Hobby Experiment
This study is a hobby experiment and should not be considered as a professional benchmark.
All four types of models were tested on both boards.
Model Type:
Models
Error
Execution Time
Flash Size
RAM Usage
Summary
-
Model Correctness: The Renesas board fails to run some of the models. Other than that, the two boards provide similar results. (1)
Except for the int8 only version of TinyMLPerf_MBNet model.
-
Execution Time:
-
The Renesas board did not utilize the CMSIS-NN library, so we should exclude the int8 only versions from the comparison.
-
The Renesas board is just slightly faster than the STM board.
-
-
Flash Size: STM is a bit better in terms of flash size.
-
RAM Usage: The two boards use almost the same amount of RAM.
-
Conclusion: The two boards seem to have a relatively similar performance. The Renesas board might be slightly faster, but the STM board has a bit smaller flash size. (1)
These boards have many settings that might favor one over the other in certain cases. Our study was conducted in an almost default settings with a good optimization level, but it is not comprehensive enough to cover all possible scenarios.































